From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackburn v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 11, 1984
314 S.E.2d 244 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

67311.

DECIDED JANUARY 11, 1984.

Robbery. Douglas Superior Court. Before Judge Noland.

Donald B. Howe, Jr., for appellant.

Frank C. Winn, District Attorney, J. David McDade, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


This is an appeal by the defendant in a robbery case. After a jury trial ended in mistrial, the appellant sought a "Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Mistrial" on grounds that certain evidence should not have been admitted and the state's case, without that evidence, is insufficient to support a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellant failed to obtain pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-2 (Code Ann. § 6-1002a) a certificate of immediate review of the trial court's refusal to enter judgment notwithstanding the mistrial, as was done in Phillips v. State, 133 Ga. App. 461 ( 211 S.E.2d 411). The state, seeking our instruction and inviting "a definitive ruling on the merits . . . voluntarily waives any objection it may have in regards to the [appeal] procedure."

The state cannot do this. It is not within the state's power to confer appellate jurisdiction, nor to waive the absence of it. See, e.g., Newton v. K. B. Property Mgt. of Ga., 166 Ga. App. 901 ( 306 S.E.2d 5); Evans v. Davey, 154 Ga. App. 269, 270 ( 267 S.E.2d 875). This appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. McMurray, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 11, 1984.


Summaries of

Blackburn v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 11, 1984
314 S.E.2d 244 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Blackburn v. State

Case Details

Full title:BLACKBURN v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 11, 1984

Citations

314 S.E.2d 244 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
314 S.E.2d 244

Citing Cases

Rhyne v. State

This court reviewed the merits of defendants' motion for acquittal and reversed the trial court's denial of…

Johnson v. State

The state has raised no objection to the timeliness of the filing of the notice; however, it is not within…