From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Blackbird Tech LLC v. Lululemon Athletica, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 6, 2018
2017-2350 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2018)

Opinion

2017-2350

09-06-2018

BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, DBA BLACKBIRD TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LULULEMON ATHLETICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee

CHRISTOPHER FREEMAN, Blackbird Technologies, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by WENDY VERLANDER, Boston, MA; STAMATIOS STAMOULIS, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE. AARON GABRIEL FOUNTAIN, DLA Piper US LLP, Austin, TX, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN GUARAGNA; BRIAN BIGGS, DENISE SEASTONE KRAFT, Wilmington, DE.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:15-cv-00930-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER FREEMAN, Blackbird Technologies, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by WENDY VERLANDER, Boston, MA; STAMATIOS STAMOULIS, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, Wilmington, DE. AARON GABRIEL FOUNTAIN, DLA Piper US LLP, Austin, TX, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JOHN GUARAGNA; BRIAN BIGGS, DENISE SEASTONE KRAFT, Wilmington, DE. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 6, 2018

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Blackbird Tech LLC v. Lululemon Athletica, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 6, 2018
2017-2350 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Blackbird Tech LLC v. Lululemon Athletica, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, DBA BLACKBIRD TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff-Appellant v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 2018

Citations

2017-2350 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2018)