Opinion
2021-1124
11-08-2021
BLACKBERRY LIMITED, Appellant v. ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor
James M. Glass, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by Sean Gloth, II; James R. Asperger, Los Angeles, CA; Felipe Corredor, Sam Stephen Stake, San Francisco, CA, Kevin P.B. Johnson, Redwood Shores, CA. Monica Barnes Lateef, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Peter J. Ayers, Michael S. Forman, Thomas W. Krause, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-00706.
James M. Glass, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by Sean Gloth, II; James R. Asperger, Los Angeles, CA; Felipe Corredor, Sam Stephen Stake, San Francisco, CA, Kevin P.B. Johnson, Redwood Shores, CA.
Monica Barnes Lateef, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by Peter J. Ayers, Michael S. Forman, Thomas W. Krause, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.
JUDGMENT
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM
Moore, Chief Judge, Clevenger and Chen, Circuit Judges.
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.