From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-2228 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2228 KJN P

12-20-2021

RANDY L. BLACK, Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner is provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.


Summaries of

Black v. Thompson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-2228 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Black v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:RANDY L. BLACK, Petitioner, v. PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-2228 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)