From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 26, 2012
CASE NO. 3:09-cv-1043-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Apr. 26, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:09-cv-1043-MEF WO

04-26-2012

LORINZA BLACK, Petitioner, v. WILLIE THOMAS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:

1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #30) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on April 19, 2012 is overruled;

2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #29) filed on April 4, 2012 is adopted;

3. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED as it was not filed within the one-year period of limitation mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1) and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE this the 26th day of April, 2012.

Mark E. Fuller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Black v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 26, 2012
CASE NO. 3:09-cv-1043-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Apr. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Black v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:LORINZA BLACK, Petitioner, v. WILLIE THOMAS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 3:09-cv-1043-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Apr. 26, 2012)