From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. State

State of the Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Jan 4, 2013
No. 11-12-00262-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-12-00262-CR

01-04-2013

SHINICE FONTELLARENE BLACK, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 32nd District Court


Nolan County, Texas


Trial Court Cause No. 11170


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Shinice Fontellarene Black entered an open plea of guilty to the first-degree felony offense of engaging in organized criminal activity. After accepting appellant's plea of guilty and receiving evidence pertaining to punishment, the trial court assessed her punishment at confinement for a term of fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of $1,000. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of her right to review the record and file a response to counsel's brief. A response has not been filed. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); and Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2005, no pet.).

By letter, this court granted appellant thirty days in which to exercise her right to file a response to counsel's brief.

Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently re-viewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit and should be dismissed. Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409.

We note that counsel has the responsibility to advise appellant that she may file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals seeking review by that court. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4 ("In criminal cases, the attorney representing the defendant on appeal shall, within five days after the opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of the defendant's right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review under Rule 68."). Likewise, this court advises appellant that she may file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.

The motion to withdraw is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Willson, J.


Summaries of

Black v. State

State of the Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Jan 4, 2013
No. 11-12-00262-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Black v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHINICE FONTELLARENE BLACK, Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of the Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 4, 2013

Citations

No. 11-12-00262-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 4, 2013)