From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Royal Am. Mgmt.

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Nov 6, 2024
Civil Action 1:24-CV-00229-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Nov. 6, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:24-CV-00229-KD-N

11-06-2024

Latonia Black, Plaintiff, v. Royal American Management, Anna Burdine, and Hallmark Mobile L.P., Defendants.


ORDER

KATHERINE P. NELSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the Court are two competing motions: Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Compliance (Doc. 18) and Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 19), both filed on October 28, 2024. The assigned District Judge referred these filings to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for appropriate action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)-(b), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)-(b). (10/28/2024 elec. ref.).

Defendants filed a response (Doc. 20), followed by Plaintiff's reply on November 1, 2024 (Doc. 22). Plaintiff filed a response opposing the Motion to Stay on October 28, 2024 (Doc. 21).

Upon due consideration, Defendants' Motion to Stay (Doc. 19) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Compliance (Doc. 18) is GRANTED, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the forthcoming Preliminary Scheduling Order.

The undersigned's Report and Recommendation for partial dismissal is pending before the assigned District Judge (Doc. 23). Regardless of the outcome, all Defendants remain named parties in the complaint.

DONE and ORDERED this the 6th Day of November 2024.


Summaries of

Black v. Royal Am. Mgmt.

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Nov 6, 2024
Civil Action 1:24-CV-00229-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Nov. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Black v. Royal Am. Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:Latonia Black, Plaintiff, v. Royal American Management, Anna Burdine, and…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Nov 6, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 1:24-CV-00229-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Nov. 6, 2024)