From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Mich. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 10-cv-11211 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-11211

03-08-2013

IVAN BLACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.


HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

MAG. JUDGE PAUL KOMIVES


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul Komives's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated January 23, 2013 [docket entry 29]. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R&R pursuant to FED R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2).

This Court had an opportunity to fully review this matter and believes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Paul Komives's Report and Recommendation dated January 23, 2013, is hereby accepted and adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment [docket entry 25] is granted.

___________

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 8, 2013

Detroit, Michigan


Summaries of

Black v. Mich. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 8, 2013
Civil Action No. 10-cv-11211 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Black v. Mich. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:IVAN BLACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-11211 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 8, 2013)