From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. First Nat Bank of Brooksville

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 20, 1929
119 So. 521 (Fla. 1929)

Opinion

Opinion filed February 20, 1929.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court of Hernando County; W. S. Bullock, Judge.

Hampton Green, for Plaintiff in Error;

Marby, Reaves Carlton and Whitehurst Whitehurst, for Defendants in Error.


The defendants in error here, against whom a judgment for $50.00 was rendered in the trial court, could have taken a writ of error to such judgment against them.

The sale of the $23,000.00 collateral note to one of its makers for $5,000.00 under the circumstances shown, was a violation of the rights of the plaintiff in error, the owner of the collateral note, and there is no sufficient showing that plaintiff in error waived, abandoned or forfeited his rights in the premises. The record does not sustain a judgment for only $50.00 in favor of the plaintiff in error and he had a right to a review by writ of error.

Rehearing denied.

TERRELL, C. J. AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J. concur.


Summaries of

Black v. First Nat Bank of Brooksville

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Feb 20, 1929
119 So. 521 (Fla. 1929)
Case details for

Black v. First Nat Bank of Brooksville

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN O. BLACK, Plaintiff in Error, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Feb 20, 1929

Citations

119 So. 521 (Fla. 1929)
119 So. 521