From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 12, 2017
No. 73217 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2017)

Opinion

No. 73217

10-12-2017

ANTHONY ROSS BLACK, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE SUSAN JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks an order compelling the district court to proceed on a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus and pro se supplemental petition petitioner filed in 2000. Petitioner asserts "Ground Four, No. (8)" of the pro se supplemental petition was not resolved by the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order" entered by the district court on December 6, 2001, and the district court should be compelled to resolve this claim. We have considered all documents filed in this matter and we are not satisfied this court's intervention by way of extraordinary writ is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

The Honorable Abbi Silver did not participate in the decision in this matter. --------

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge

Anthony Ross Black

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Black v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 12, 2017
No. 73217 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Black v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ROSS BLACK, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 12, 2017

Citations

No. 73217 (Nev. App. Oct. 12, 2017)