From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Edd

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 27, 2024
No. 04-23-00923-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2024)

Opinion

04-23-00923-CV

03-27-2024

Stephen Patrick BLACK, Appellant v. Dr. Nicholas EDD and Penile Plethysmorgraph Clinican II, Appellee


From the 274th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. CC 23-1518-CV-B Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The panel on original submission, having fully examined and considered appellant's motion for rehearing, is of the opinion that appellant's motion for rehearing should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 49.3. Accordingly, we DENY appellant's motion for rehearing.

It is so ORDERED


Summaries of

Black v. Edd

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 27, 2024
No. 04-23-00923-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Black v. Edd

Case Details

Full title:Stephen Patrick BLACK, Appellant v. Dr. Nicholas EDD and Penile…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Mar 27, 2024

Citations

No. 04-23-00923-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 27, 2024)