From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. Donald

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Dec 7, 2006
CASE NO. 7:06-CV-75(HL) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2006)

Opinion

CASE NO. 7:06-CV-75(HL).

December 7, 2006


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 10) filed November 14, 2006 has been read and considered and is, hereby, approved, adopted and made the Order of the Court except for the following modification.

The heading of subsection K refers to claims 22, 23, 25 and 24. However, the summary of this subsection fails to address or rule on claim 25. After reading the Recommendation it is obvious to this Court that claim 25 was simply overlooked in the summary of subsection K of the Recommendation, but clearly is encompassed by the Magistrate Judge's discussion and should have been dismissed as were claims 22 and 23.

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the Recommendation as pertaining to claims 22 and 23, and the explanation above, claim 25 is also hereby dismissed.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Black v. Donald

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Dec 7, 2006
CASE NO. 7:06-CV-75(HL) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Black v. Donald

Case Details

Full title:CHANCE EDWARD BLACK, Plaintiff v. JAMES DONALD, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Dec 7, 2006

Citations

CASE NO. 7:06-CV-75(HL) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 7, 2006)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Aramark

The “Constitution does not guarantee fair prices at the commissary.” Munson v. Wilcher, 2019 WL 2339264, at…

Hoffstetter v. Manatee Cnty. Jail Trinity Canteen

S.D. Ga. Apr. 18, 2019) (recognizing that the “Constitution does not guarantee fair prices at the…