From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Black v. City of Marysville

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2007
CIV-S-06-1104 GEB EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)

Opinion

CIV-S-06-1104 GEB EFB.

August 28, 2007


Plaintiffs filed a discovery motion on August 21, 2007, and set the matter for hearing on September 19, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. Notwithstanding the three days specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251, the joint statement shall be filed in no later than five court days before the scheduled hearing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be September 12, 2007.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached, if appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party's position; and (4) the opposition. E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5). Except in extraordinary circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege log. The failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to waive it.

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions.


Summaries of

Black v. City of Marysville

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2007
CIV-S-06-1104 GEB EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Black v. City of Marysville

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER BLACK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MARYSVILLE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2007

Citations

CIV-S-06-1104 GEB EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2007)