From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bjorlin v. Morrow

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 9, 2010
No. 2: 10-cv-2162 FCD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2: 10-cv-2162 FCD KJN P.

December 9, 2010


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed November 3, 2010, plaintiff was granted twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 8, 2010


Summaries of

Bjorlin v. Morrow

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 9, 2010
No. 2: 10-cv-2162 FCD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Bjorlin v. Morrow

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL P. BJORLIN, Plaintiff, v. DR. MORROW, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 9, 2010

Citations

No. 2: 10-cv-2162 FCD KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2010)