From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bizzell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 3, 2021
327 So. 3d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2313

11-03-2021

Frank Anton BIZZELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Frank Anton Bizzell, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Frank Anton Bizzell, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

B.L. Thomas, Roberts, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bizzell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 3, 2021
327 So. 3d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Bizzell v. State

Case Details

Full title:Frank Anton BIZZELL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

327 So. 3d 482 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)