From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bizhko v. McKinnon

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2021
2:21-cv-01137-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01137-TLN-CKD

11-29-2021

RUSLAN A BIZHKO. Plaintiff, v. THOMAS MCKINNON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). On September 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF N. 4.) Plaintiff has not objected to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a review of this matter. The Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 16, 2021 (ECF No. 4), are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Bizhko v. McKinnon

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 29, 2021
2:21-cv-01137-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Bizhko v. McKinnon

Case Details

Full title:RUSLAN A BIZHKO. Plaintiff, v. THOMAS MCKINNON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01137-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2021)