From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bizarro v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 8, 2022
No. 14338-21 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

14338-21

03-08-2022

Joseph L. Bizarro, Jr. Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley, Chief Judge

On August 10, 2021, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the grounds that the petition was not filed within the time prescribed by I.R.C. section 6213(a) or section 7502. The Court ordered petitioner to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss on or before October 18, 2021. To this date, petitioner has not filed an objection to respondent's motion to dismiss.

This Court is a court of limited jurisdiction. It may therefore exercise jurisdiction only to the extent expressly provided by statute. Breman v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 61, 66 (1976). In a deficiency case, the jurisdiction of the Court depends on (1) the issuance by the Commissioner of a notice of deficiency, and (2) the filing of a timely petition after the notice of deficiency is mailed. Rule 13(a) and (c), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.

There being no showing in the record that the petition in this case as to the notice of deficiency for taxable year 2018 was filed within the time prescribed by I.R.C. section 6213(a) or section 7502, it is

ORDERED that respondent's August 10, 2021, Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Bizarro v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 8, 2022
No. 14338-21 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Bizarro v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Joseph L. Bizarro, Jr. Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Citations

No. 14338-21 (U.S.T.C. Mar. 8, 2022)