Bivolarevic v. U.S. CIA

Full title: VESNA BIVOLAREVIC, Plaintiff, v. U.S. CIA, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Feb 16, 2010

C 09-4620 SBA (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2010)

Opinion

VESNA BIVOLAREVIC, Plaintiff, v. U.S. CIA, Defendant. No. C 09-4620 SBA United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. February 16, 2010

          ORDER Docket 45.

          SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

         Plaintiff filed a pro se "Written Request to the Court and the Judge for the Changes to the Existing Judge' (sic) Armstrong Standing Order" on February 8, 2010. She requests relief from the ADR process and ADR telephone conference, that she be provided with the name of Defendant's lead counsel, and for the Court to accept her Case Management Conference Statement. Based on the allegations of the Complaint, and in light of Defendant's pending motion to dismiss, the Court will defer the ADR process and the necessity of filing a Case Management Conference Statement until after the Court rules on the motion to dismiss. As for the identity of Defendant's lead counsel, Plaintiff should be able to ascertain the identity of this individual from the documents filed by Defendant. Therefore, such request is denied as moot. Accordingly,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion to modify the Court's standing orders is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth above. This Order terminates Docket 45.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.