From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Biviescas v. Doan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:16-cv-0451 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:16-cv-0451 KJN P

12-01-2021

CARLOS BIVIESCAS, Plaintiff, v. NICK DOAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge to this action; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: December 1, 2021


Summaries of

Biviescas v. Doan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:16-cv-0451 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Biviescas v. Doan

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS BIVIESCAS, Plaintiff, v. NICK DOAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

2:16-cv-0451 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)