From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bivens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 2002
813 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-4259.

February 13, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard C. Berman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 93-8156 CFA02.

Leon L. Bivens, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3,850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 553 (Fla. 3d DCA) review granted, 797 So.2d 586 (Fla. 2001).

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bivens v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 13, 2002
813 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Bivens v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEON L. BIVENS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 13, 2002

Citations

813 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)