From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bittel v. Mazzola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

January, 1929.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Scudder, JJ.


Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. In our opinion the conduct of counsel for defendant Owens in cross-examining witnesses for defendant Mazzola and in presenting defendant Owens' case, together with the uncontradicted statement of plaintiff's counsel, made at the close of defendant Mazzola's case, that defendants had agreed that one or the other was negligent and that they would fight it out between them, indicates that defendant Owens intended to contest the question of negligence with his codefendant irrespective of the fact that plaintiff's story generally coincided with his. As between the defendants, liability has been thrust by the jury on defendant Owens.


Summaries of

Bittel v. Mazzola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Bittel v. Mazzola

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET BITTEL, Respondent, v. VINCENZO MAZZOLA, Defendant, and THOMAS J…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1929

Citations

225 App. Div. 821 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)