From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bismark v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 2, 2005
912 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2005)

Opinion

Case No. SC04-1135.

September 2, 2005.

Lower Tribunal No. 1D03-5217.


Petitioner has filed a motion for rehearing and/or clarification. To the extent petitioner seeks rehearing, the motion is hereby denied. To the extent petitioner seeks clarification of the Court's January 3, 2005, denial order, the motion is granted. The Court's January 3, 2005, order addressed the petition for writ of mandamus that petitioner filed with this Court seeking reinstatement of petitioner's appeal. The Court's order did not address the petition for writ of mandamus that petitioner filed with the circuit court.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bismark v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 2, 2005
912 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2005)
Case details for

Bismark v. Crosby

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS A. BISMARK, Petitioner(s) v. JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., ETC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 2, 2005

Citations

912 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2005)