From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2008
1:08-cv-00219-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #6) (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2008)

Opinion

1:08-cv-00219-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #6).

May 16, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 23, 2008, petitioner filed a motion to extend time to respond to the order to show cause. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Petitioner is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to respond to the order to show cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 16, 2008
1:08-cv-00219-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #6) (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2008)
Case details for

Bishop v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:NICK LEE BISHOP, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 16, 2008

Citations

1:08-cv-00219-LJO-TAG (HC), (DOCUMENT #6) (E.D. Cal. May. 16, 2008)