From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Jul 28, 1931
136 So. 318 (Fla. 1931)

Opinion

Decision filed July 28, 1931.

A writ of error to the Circuit Court for Dade County; H. F. Atkinson, Judge.

Miller McKay, for Plaintiff in Error;

Redfearn Ferrell, for Defendant in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be give in the premises, it seems to the Court there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

BUFORD, C.J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN AND DAVIS, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc
Jul 28, 1931
136 So. 318 (Fla. 1931)
Case details for

Bishop v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:W. H. BISHOP, Plaintiff in Error, vs. ARTHUR SMITH, Defendant in Error

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, En Banc

Date published: Jul 28, 1931

Citations

136 So. 318 (Fla. 1931)
136 So. 318