From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Potter

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 24, 2010
Case No.: 2:08-cv-00726-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Sep. 24, 2010)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:08-cv-00726-RLH-GWF.

September 24, 2010


ORDER (Motion for Reconsideration-#197)


Before the Court is Plaintiff Kevin Bishop's Motion for Reconsideration (#197), filed August 25, 2010. The Court has also considered Defendants' Opposition (#204), filed September 13, 2010.

Local Rule IB 3-1 provides a party taking exception to a magistrate judge's decision on a pretrial matter may serve written objection to the ruling, together with supporting point and authorities, within ten days from the date of service of the magistrate judge's ruling, and that the opposing party may file points and authorities in opposition to the objection within ten days thereafter. After conducting a de novo review of the record in this matter in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 3-1, and having considered Plaintiff's Objection and the Defendants' Opposition thereto, the Court finds that Judge Foley's order of August 11, 2010, is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, and should be affirmed.

Accordingly, and for good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bishop's Motion for Reconsideration (#197) is DENIED.

Dated: September 24, 2010


Summaries of

Bishop v. Potter

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 24, 2010
Case No.: 2:08-cv-00726-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Sep. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Bishop v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 24, 2010

Citations

Case No.: 2:08-cv-00726-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Sep. 24, 2010)