From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 22, 1988
531 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1958.

September 22, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Lawrence R. Kirkwood, Judge.

Kelvin L. Averbuch, Orlando, for appellants.

Robert A. White of Arnold, Metheny Eagan, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Joseph M. Caruso, Jr.

Robert Kit Korey and Edward F. Simpson, Jr., Ormond Beach, for appellee William T. Moore, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Laurnell E. Yafanaro.


This is an appeal from an order dismissing a complaint for declaratory relief. We affirm the order because it, in effect and by its findings, makes the correct ruling regarding the declaratory relief sought. However, we cannot affirm the award of attorney's fees against appellant. Although appellants properly lost their case, there was not a complete absence of a justiciable issue. The trial court did not make that specific finding in its order and we have determined there was an issue raised. See Allen v. Estate of Dutton, 394 So.2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), rev. den., 402 So.2d 609 (Fla. 1981). The order of dismissal is affirmed; the order granting attorney's fees is reversed. The order granting costs is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and DANIEL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 22, 1988
531 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Bishop v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:FRED A. BISHOP, HELEN DEMOS, LUCILLE DUNNIGAN, KURT KANOW, MR. AND MRS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 22, 1988

Citations

531 So. 2d 246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)