From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. McLaughlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-107(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-107(MTT)

12-20-2012

KYLE RICHARD BISHOP, III, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JOHN HILL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is the Plaintiff's Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 72). The Plaintiff brought § 1983 First Amendment claims against the Defendants, and his complaint was dismissed because the Plaintiff lacked standing due to his failure to show an actual injury. (Doc. 69). Following the dismissal, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 71) and the present Motion for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 72). However, a Certificate of Appealability is not a prerequisite to the appeal of a § 1983 action. Therefore, the Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED as moot.

______________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Bishop v. McLaughlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-107(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Bishop v. McLaughlin

Case Details

Full title:KYLE RICHARD BISHOP, III, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JOHN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-107(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 20, 2012)