From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Fuller

City Court of New York, General Term
Feb 1, 1901
34 Misc. 813 (N.Y. City Ct. 1901)

Opinion

February, 1901.

Samuel H. Randall, for appellant.

G.H. Hinnau, for respondent.


In May, 1886, nearly fifteen years ago, a default was noted in the above action and an inquest taken, but no judgment was ever entered thereon. The plaintiff moved, after that long lapse of time, for an order that the above-entitled action and all further proceedings therein be carried on in her married name, she having since the default was noted married a Mr. Nicholas. No reason was assigned for the long delay, and, although the papers on the motion and on this appeal appear to have been served on the defendant's attorney of record in 1886, no appearance has been made on her behalf either on the motion or on the hearing of the appeal. The claim is stale and we believe that the order of the Special Term in denying the plaintiff's application should be affirmed. No costs.

Present: FITZSIMONS, Ch. J., CONLAN and O'DWYER, JJ.

Order affirmed, no costs.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Fuller

City Court of New York, General Term
Feb 1, 1901
34 Misc. 813 (N.Y. City Ct. 1901)
Case details for

Bishop v. Fuller

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR F. BISHOP, Appellant, v . LEONE FULLER, Respondent

Court:City Court of New York, General Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1901

Citations

34 Misc. 813 (N.Y. City Ct. 1901)

Citing Cases

Lawrence v. Cowperthwait

(1) That a plaintiff's laches may be so gross as to constitute an abandonment of the action and to preclude…