From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Friedland

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Aug 11, 2008
2008 Ohio 4100 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 91640.

RELEASE DATE: August 11, 2008.

WRIT DENIED, WRIT OF PROCEDENDO, MOTION NO. 410842, ORDER NO. 411585.

Cassandra Bishop, pro se, for Relator.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, By: Thorin Freeman and T. Allan Regas, Assistant County Prosecutors, Attorneys for Respondent.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


{¶ 1} Relator requests that this court compel respondent judge to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the petition for postconviction relief filed by relator in State v. Bishop, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Case No. CR-494151 on February 28, 2008.

{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment attached to which is a copy of the findings of fact and conclusions of law issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on July 2, 2008. Relator has not opposed the motion. Respondent argues that this action in mandamus is, therefore, moot. We agree.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ. R. 58(B).

Writ denied.

ANN DYKE, J., and FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Friedland

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Aug 11, 2008
2008 Ohio 4100 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Bishop v. Friedland

Case Details

Full title:Cassandra Bishop, ex rel. Relator, v. Carolyn b. Friedland, Judge…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Aug 11, 2008

Citations

2008 Ohio 4100 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)