From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Dodson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:21-CV-0574-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-0574-KJM-DMC-P

10-26-2022

TOR AHMADD BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. G. DODSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provide by Eastern District of California local rules.

On April 8, 2022, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 8, 2022, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, ECF No. 14, is denied; and

3. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Dodson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 26, 2022
2:21-CV-0574-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Bishop v. Dodson

Case Details

Full title:TOR AHMADD BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. G. DODSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 26, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-0574-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2022)