From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bishop v. Bishop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1941
262 App. Div. 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

October 6, 1941.


Action for partition. Order denying plaintiffs' cross-motion for interlocutory judgment of partition, under sections 1024 and 1025 of the Civil Practice Act, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Order granting motion of the defendants Cecelia A. Bishop, John T. Bishop, James G. Bishop and Marie C. Dorsey for an order dismissing the first and second amended complaints and canceling notices of pendency of action, unless the plaintiffs Edward J. Donohue, Joseph P. Donohue and Anna Donohue Kessel, within the time therein limited, shall serve a second amended complaint and comply with other terms therein specified, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; such amended complaint to be served and such other terms complied with by the three plaintiffs last mentioned, within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bishop v. Bishop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1941
262 App. Div. 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Bishop v. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. BISHOP and Others, Appellants, v. JOHN T. BISHOP and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1941

Citations

262 App. Div. 1023 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)