Bisel v. Fisher

Full title: GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, Petitioner, v. RAY FISHER, JR., et al., Respondents.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 3, 2021

1:17-cv-00013-DAD-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:17-cv-00013-DAD-SKO (HC)

09-03-2021

GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, Petitioner, v. RAY FISHER, JR., et al., Respondents.

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S

SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Doc. 63]

[DEADLINE: OCTOBER 4, 2021]

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 2, 2021, Respondent filed a second request for extension of time to file a response. (Doc. 63.)

Good cause having been presented and good cause appearing therefor, Respondent is GRANTED thirty (30) days to and including October 4, 2021, to file a response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.