From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bisbing v. Bisbing

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 12, 2018
180 A.3d 714 (N.J. 2018)

Opinion

M–866/867 September Term 2017 077533

03-12-2018

Jaime Taormina BISBING, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Glenn R. BISBING, III, Defendant–Movant.


ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for counsel fees and costs is denied without prejudice to defendant-movant making the application to the trial court for counsel fees and costs for work performed before the Supreme Court, and the trial court is hereby authorized to make the determination and award. For purposes of that determination, the trial court is directed to deem defendant-movant as the prevailing party before the Supreme Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the miscellaneous motion to compel plaintiff to pay fees awarded by the Appellate Division (M-867) is denied without prejudice to defendant-movant making an appropriate application for enforcement to the trial court. Jurisdiction is not retained.


Summaries of

Bisbing v. Bisbing

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 12, 2018
180 A.3d 714 (N.J. 2018)
Case details for

Bisbing v. Bisbing

Case Details

Full title:Jaime Taormina BISBING, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Glenn R. BISBING, III…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 12, 2018

Citations

180 A.3d 714 (N.J. 2018)
232 N.J. 396