From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birston v. Primus

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Nov 6, 2007
NO. 5:07-CV-68 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 6, 2007)

Opinion

NO. 5:07-CV-68 (HL).

November 6, 2007


PROCEEDINGS UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Before The U.S. Magistrate Judge ORDER


Before the court is defendants' MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES. Tab #13. The defendants' motion asks that the court consolidate the above-styled action with Spencer v. Primus, et al. , Civil Action No. 5:07-CV-69 (CAR), and Gross v. Primus , Civil Action No. 5:07-CV-93 (WDO). The defendants have asserted that the issues of law fact in the three cases are common and that a consolidation would serve the interests of economy and justice.

While the issues involved may be common in law and fact, the court is not inclined to appoint counsel for any of the plaintiffs in these cases, all of whom are litigating their cases on their own behalf. Consolidation of these three cases would therefore lead to three separate inmates' co-litigating one action, which would likely lead to more trouble than convenience. Accordingly, the defendants' motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Birston v. Primus

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Nov 6, 2007
NO. 5:07-CV-68 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Birston v. Primus

Case Details

Full title:J. T. BIRSTON, Plaintiff v. T. PRIMUS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Nov 6, 2007

Citations

NO. 5:07-CV-68 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 6, 2007)