From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birsner v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 1998
250 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 26, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's cross motion is granted.

The various discovery demands which are the subject of this appeal were improper, given their overly broad and burdensome nature and their questionable relevance ( see, Harris v. City of New York, 211 A.D.2d 663).

Rosenblatt, J.P., Sullivan, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Birsner v. Town of Islip

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 1998
250 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Birsner v. Town of Islip

Case Details

Full title:STACEY BIRSNER et al., Respondents, v. TOWN OF ISLIP, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 26, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 702

Citing Cases

Heritage Hills v. Heritage Development

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for a protective order…