From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birrell v. Knauf

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1707-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1707-GEB-CMK-P.

February 24, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for an order appointing a jailhouse lawyer to assist her (Doc. 18). The motion is denied as unnecessary because, where no reasonable alternative exists, plaintiff has a right to access to inmate assistance subject to the prison's ability to impose reasonable restrictions, and plaintiff has not claimed improper denial by prison staff of access to a jailhouse lawyer. See Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1981).

Plaintiff is a male-to-female transgender person who prefers to be referred to using feminine pronouns.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 23, 2011


Summaries of

Birrell v. Knauf

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1707-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Birrell v. Knauf

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, aka BELLA-CHRISTINA BIRRELL, Plaintiff, v. KEITH…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1707-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2011)