From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birrell v. Fox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P

10-11-2022

DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., Plaintiff, v. ROBERT W. FOX, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A suggestion of death upon the record pertaining to the death of plaintiff Sargent was filed on July 6, 2022. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25, a motion for substitution of a proper party must be made no later than ninety days after the death is suggested upon the record. That time period has now expired, and no motion for substitution has been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff Sargent be dismissed.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after service of these findings and recommendations, any written objections may be filed with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Birrell v. Fox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Birrell v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., Plaintiff, v. ROBERT W. FOX, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)