From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birrell v. Fox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:16-cv-1818 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

2:16-cv-1818 JAM CKD P

06-29-2022

DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT W. FOX, Defendant.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On May 10, 2019, this matter was stayed to permit plaintiffs to find replacement counsel for their prior attorney who was allowed to withdraw. No attorney has filed an appearance and plaintiffs have not updated the court as to their efforts to find counsel.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 21days, plaintiffs file a status report indicating whether they have obtained counsel and, if not, whether they wish to pursue this matter pro se. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Birrell v. Fox

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 29, 2022
2:16-cv-1818 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Birrell v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT W. FOX, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

2:16-cv-1818 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2022)