From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birnbaum v. Constanza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2005
17 A.D.3d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-02963

April 4, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Jayne A. Spadaro appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated February 26, 2004, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ryan, Perrone Hartlein, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (William T. Ryan and Robin Mary Heaney of counsel), for appellant.

Falk Klebanoff, P.C., West Hempstead, N.Y. (Jeffrey P. Falk of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to establish her entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853). Thus, the burden never shifted to the plaintiff to establish the existence of a triable issue of fact ( see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562), and the court need not consider the sufficiency of the papers in opposition to the motion ( see Lesane v. Tejada, 15 AD3d 358; Roberts v. Carl Fenichel Community Servs., Inc., 13 AD3d 511; Kolosovskiy v. Vitale, 7 AD3d 579; Mariaca-Olmos v. Mizrhy, 226 AD2d 437, 438).


Summaries of

Birnbaum v. Constanza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2005
17 A.D.3d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Birnbaum v. Constanza

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN A. BIRNBAUM, Respondent, v. PASQUALE CONSTANZA et al., Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 304 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 853

Citing Cases

Schall v. Curry

Thus, defendants failed to demonstrate that plaintiff did not sustain a "serious injury" within the meaning…

Moreno v. Wudha

Accordingly, defendants' motion (002) for an order granting summary judgment is denied. Inasmuch as…