(SAC at 12, 14; see also Compl. at 12, 14). Permitting Plaintiff every inference to which he is entitled on a motion to dismiss, and bearing in mind the special solicitude due a pro se litigant, these facts allege plausibly that the BOL regarded Plaintiff as having a disability that substantially limited a major life activity (i.e., working).See Birnbach v. Americares Found. Inc., No. 19-CV-1328, 2020 WL 3510843, at *7-8 (D. Conn. June 29, 2020) (the plaintiff alleged plausibly that his employer at least perceived him as mentally impaired by, inter alia, a supervisor's reference to the plaintiff's "learning style and information processing"). The Court notes that the "inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working."