Birmingham v. State

Full title: Terry U. Birmingham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 29, 2015

471 S.W.3d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

WD 77797

09-29-2015

Terry U. Birmingham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Per Curiam

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Order

Per Curiam:

Terry Birmingham appeals the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Birmingham raises two claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because Birmingham failed to meet his burden of proving that counsel provided ineffective assistance, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).