From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Putman

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 21, 1926
109 So. 891 (Ala. 1926)

Opinion

6 Div. 757.

October 21, 1926.

W. S. Pritchard and J. D. Higgins, both of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Bradley, Baldwin, All White, and Wm. Douglas Arant, all of Birmingham, for respondent.


Petition of John S. Putman for certiorari to Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Birmingham Electric Co. v. Putman, 21 Ala. App. 431, 109 So. 890.

Petition dismissed for failure of compliance with Supreme Court rule 44, Code 1923, vol. 4, p. 894.

SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Putman

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 21, 1926
109 So. 891 (Ala. 1926)
Case details for

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Putman

Case Details

Full title:BIRMINGHAM ELECTRIC CO. v. PUTMAN

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 21, 1926

Citations

109 So. 891 (Ala. 1926)
215 Ala. 107

Citing Cases

Birmingham Electric Co. v. Putman

Reversed and remanded. Petition for certiorari dismissed by Supreme Court in Birmingham Electric Co. v.…