From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birkenshaw v. Union Light, Heat Power Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 19, 1993
987 F.2d 392 (6th Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-5395.

May 19, 1993.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.


Summaries of

Birkenshaw v. Union Light, Heat Power Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
May 19, 1993
987 F.2d 392 (6th Cir. 1993)
Case details for

Birkenshaw v. Union Light, Heat Power Co.

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA L. BIRKENSHAW, ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ARTHUR R…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: May 19, 1993

Citations

987 F.2d 392 (6th Cir. 1993)