From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birkenholz v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Oct 26, 2016
888 N.W.2d 903 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16–0217.

10-26-2016

Brian David BIRKENHOLZ, Petitioner–Appellant, v. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION, Respondent–Appellee.

Grant C. Gangestad of Gourley, Rehkemper & Lindholm, P.L.C., West Des Moines, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Michelle E. Rabe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Grant C. Gangestad of Gourley, Rehkemper & Lindholm, P.L.C., West Des Moines, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Michelle E. Rabe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Considered by POTTERFIELD, P.J., and DOYLE and TABOR, JJ.

DOYLE, Judge.

Brian Birkenholz appeals from the district court's dismissal of his petition for judicial review concerning his driver's license revocation by the Iowa Department of Transportation. The district court concluded Birkenholz failed to file his petition for judicial review within thirty days of the agency's final decision as mandated by Iowa Code section 17A.19(3) (2015).

After a careful review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the district court's thorough and well-reasoned ruling, we conclude the district court's ruling dismissing Birkenholz's petition should be affirmed without opinion pursuant to Iowa Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.1203(a), (c), and (d).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Birkenholz v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div.

Court of Appeals of Iowa.
Oct 26, 2016
888 N.W.2d 903 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Birkenholz v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div.

Case Details

Full title:Brian David BIRKENHOLZ, Petitioner–Appellant, v. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Iowa.

Date published: Oct 26, 2016

Citations

888 N.W.2d 903 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016)