From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birk v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 2003
304 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

667

April 1, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about December 14, 2001, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Marshall B. Bellovin, for plaintiff-appellant.

Joyce Rachel Ellman, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


The complaint, alleging that plaintiff was subjected to impermissible workplace discrimination by reason of a medical disability, was properly dismissed since defendant employer set forth a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the alleged adverse employment action and plaintiff did not, in response, meet his burden to raise a triable issue as to whether defendant's proffered reason was a mere pretext (see Ferrante v. Am. Lung Assn., 90 N.Y.2d 623, 630-631).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Birk v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 1, 2003
304 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Birk v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:ALDUR M. BIRK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 1, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 319 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
756 N.Y.S.2d 745