Opinion
Submitted February 24, 1992
Decided April 3, 1992
Motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Cross motion for imposition of sanctions denied.
Judges SIMONS and ALEXANDER taking no part.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Birk Iron Works, Inc. v. Van Tulco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1992
79 N.Y.2d 975 (N.Y. 1992)
Summaries of
Birk Iron Works, Inc. v. Van Tulco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 3, 1992
79 N.Y.2d 975 (N.Y. 1992)
Case details for
Birk Iron Works, Inc. v. Van Tulco, Inc.
Case Details
Full title:BIRK IRON WORKS, INC., Respondent, v. VAN TULCO, INC., et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Apr 3, 1992
Citations
79 N.Y.2d 975 (N.Y. 1992)
583 N.Y.S.2d 189
592 N.E.2d 797
Citing Cases
Adirondack Classic Design, Inc. v. Farrell
Although defendant attempts to hold plaintiff to the terms of the written construction contract, evidence…