From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Birdsall v. General Electric Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

November, 1923.


Award affirmed, with costs in favor of the State Industrial Board. H.T. Kellogg, Van Kirk and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Hinman and McCann, JJ., dissent on the authority of Matter of Jordan v. Decorative Co. ( 230 N.Y. 522).


Summaries of

Birdsall v. General Electric Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

Birdsall v. General Electric Company

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. EDWARD BIRDSALL, Claimant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1923

Citations

207 App. Div. 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)