From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bird v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 10, 2022
3:20-CV-114 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 10, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-CV-114 3:17-CR-013

03-10-2022

KIETH L. BIRD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

Leon Jordan, United States District Judge.

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, Petitioner's pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Doc. 1; Criminal Doc. 573] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Further, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, a certificate of appealability SHALL NOT ISSUE. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, should the Petitioner file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the civil file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bird v. United States

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Mar 10, 2022
3:20-CV-114 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Bird v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KIETH L. BIRD, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Mar 10, 2022

Citations

3:20-CV-114 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 10, 2022)