From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bird v. McDonnell

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 18, 2015
CV 14-7205-VAP (E) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2015)

Opinion


WILLIAM BIRD, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF JIM McDONNELL, et al., Defendants. No. CV 14-7205-VAP (E) United States District Court, C.D. California. February 18, 2015

          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action without prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of this Order and the Judgment of this date on Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Bird v. McDonnell

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 18, 2015
CV 14-7205-VAP (E) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Bird v. McDonnell

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BIRD, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF JIM McDONNELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 18, 2015

Citations

CV 14-7205-VAP (E) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 18, 2015)