From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bird v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 23, 2018
Case No. 5:17-cv-01998-MWF (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5:17-cv-01998-MWF (JDE)

07-23-2018

MICHAEL WAYNE BIRD, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 50). Plaintiff did not file any written objections to the report within the time allotted or seek additional time in which to do so.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; and

2. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Dated: July 23, 2018

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bird v. Cnty. of Riverside

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION
Jul 23, 2018
Case No. 5:17-cv-01998-MWF (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Bird v. Cnty. of Riverside

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WAYNE BIRD, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2018

Citations

Case No. 5:17-cv-01998-MWF (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2018)